Tom Breur
24 May 2015
As part of the Scrum
routine, teams have daily standups. Quick, efficient, and to the point,
following a specific outline. What did I finish yesterday, what will I commit
to today, and what are my impediments (click here
for an earlier blogpost on impediments)? They are called “stand-ups” for a
reason. The justification for doing these meetings on your feet rather than on
a chair is to avoid people getting comfortable, to help keep these meetings
short. A tiny bit of time saved every day amounts to considerable time over the
lifetime of a project.
Of course the only reason
to be standing up is to save time, to help the meeting stay focused and short.
If you can accomplish the same goal while being seated – great! An additional
benefit of standing might sometimes be that a group forming a semi-circle
around their Kanban board allows direct eye-to-eye contact for all
participants.
More accurately, these
“Kanban boards” are mostly task- or story-boards. My friend Michael Mahlberg
wrote a great post
about these, recently. We seem to have “loosened” these terms, as if they are
the same (they are not!). But like a Kanban board, these story boards are meant
as information
radiators. Better communication, more effective feedback, cues from non-verbal behavior, etc. all serve to
maximize benefits from face-to-face interaction.
Stand-ups can get
“boring”, though, especially if they last longer than they need to. They are
emphatically not a status meeting. The key to keeping your contribution
short is to focus on your (“net”) output – which implies referring to the business
value of your accomplished tasks. Especially for more “technical” jobs it can
be challenging to phrase these in “business” terms, yet there exactly lies the
key to success. Unless you can express this business value, why are you doing
this in the first place??
No comments:
Post a Comment