2016-01-31

Slack is not (just) for slackers

Tom Breur
31 January 2016

Some management philosophies give me the creeps. They badly disturb me. One of those, one of my pet peeves, is that managers should “drive out” slack.  It’s this weird philosophy that people who are idle should be told what to do, or encouraged to pick up more work.

There’s a classic “scene” in The Goal where Alex Rogue “catches” a slacking worker – and this infuriates him. It’s not until much later in the book that he realizes that all efficient systems must have slack. Although this wisdom may be fairly clear, it may well be a little harder to apply when you’re looking at your own team slacking… I feel sympathy for that.

If you’ve ever been totally stuck in a traffic jam, where the highway turns into a proverbial parking lot, you know you need some slack (in this case: distance between cars) to operate efficiently. Or else the traffic doesn’t move very well. When my cabinet is chock full, it’s not only annoying, it also becomes a very inefficient cabinet to use. Not enough slack.

I guess it all comes down to trust. If you anticipate “slackers” (subordinates in an idle mode) to goof off on Facebook, or generally escape their duties (rather than invest some time in researching a new piece of technology, hone their technical skills, or “just” replenish their energy), then I guess the “management by whipping”-philosophy makes sense. But isn’t it ironic how much time and (wasted!) effort all this whipping costs?



No comments:

Post a Comment