Tom Breur
22 October 2017
Working at a “sustainable pace” is one of the cornerstones of
Agile, and one of the principles
of the Agile Manifesto states:
“Agile
processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users
should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.”
Work need not come in
at a steady pace. In fact, it often doesn’t. The arrival pace may have random
and almost certainly some non-random fluctuations. So how do you deal with that
variance?
A common response is to temporarily work harder to meet
deadlines and absorb any schedule pressure. This is an adaptive way to cope
with increased work pressure, but unfortunately it comes at a cost. “Burning the midnight
oil” certainly leads to temporarily improved output, which makes it an
adaptive strategy, but it has some pernicious side effects.
One of them might be that the defect rate of your work goes
up, further increasing the pressure to meet targets! A second side effect is
that if you try this tactic for too long, it burns you out – which would lead to
dramatically reduced output! It is obviously at odds with the Agile principle of
maintaining a sustainable pace.
In system dynamics, this phenomenon has been modeled with
causal diagrams:
Source: Sterman (2000) “Business Dynamics”
This model is by no means the only “right” model to show the
unwanted side effects of working overtime. But many of the feedback loops in
this diagram like “cutting corners” must surely look familiar. You probably haven’t
tried it yourself, but must surely have seen others do it, right?
Thought leader Jerry
Weinberg has suggested there may be yet another reason for people to be
tempted to work overtime. He suggests that we don't work overtime so much to get the
work done on time as to shield our- selves from blame when the work inevitably
doesn't get done on time.
One of the premises of Agile is that we fit work in
accordance with our schedule, so-called scaling
to capacity. Not the other way around. Impossible deadlines, or dreamlines,
are of all times. Only the bravest have enough confidence to admit they are in
a bind. Surprisingly, opening up that (admittedly difficult) discussion can make
a world of difference, and open the door to a collaborative discussion on how
to create the most possible value – for everyone!

No comments:
Post a Comment