2013-10-08

Multitasking and bottlenecks



There is abundant evidence about people’s inability to multi-task. For some reason, the human brain seems particularly suited for concentration (on just one thing…), and multitasking and distraction seem antithetical to that. Although email is so pervasive and omnipresent, it is also the culprit of many “lost” moments, and lapses in productivity (see this paper on that topic).

Interestingly, people who believe they are successful at multi-tasking may often only be fooling themselves (see this paper on that topic). Being a man, I am not supposed to be able to multi-task, of course. And when I try it, I tend to fail pretty spectacularly. I get distracted too easily. This brilliant (as well as funny and entertaining) presentation from my esteemed colleague Zeger van Hese sums up nicely how distraction can be so pervasive by creating lots of desirable side effects.

Besides the detrimental effect on productivity, there is one other reason to be weary of multitasking. It has to do with bottlenecks and the Theory of Constraints. In Agile we encourage working independently and in parallel, to improve productivity. Bottlenecks are (by definition) the single greatest risk to meeting iteration goals, and it turns out that multitasking plays a pernicious role in that.

As Maassen, Matts and Geary have pointed out in their book “Commitment” (2013), multitasking creates implicit bottlenecks. When someone is working on more than one task at a time, they hamper visibility on the (lack of) progress of the task they are momentarily not working on. All with the best of intentions, of course, just like when I try to multi task myself. You do this to try and finish more things quicker, but unfortunately you often wind up delaying delivery, rather than expediting it.

No comments:

Post a Comment